LABOUR
and idleness.
Labor is the great value of art and the companies seeking the assessment of individuals on their merits. The French Revolution was the first social movement which established that the noble virtues were not above the people, nor had higher privileges. These virtues as is the grace cristina, were given by God. The guillotine with sharp certainty demonstrated the falsity of these ideas. The art and work are intrinsic, the artist does. His works are a result of learning, long meditations, sketches, ideas that are fixed or thrown away, leading to a search string and tests leading to a work, that the end may be unsuccessful or successful. This is work. Michelangelo told his assistants as the only aesthetic advice: laborare, laborare . came
contemporary art and artists are the new modern tyranny is not working and whose status as an artist is a divine, metaphysical. They just think, are like the court of Marie Antoinette who lived in idleness because it was privileged and was a lowly job. did not have to learn anything, they need not know anything, boasted of his ignorance, his indifference, made fun of the fools who were determined to seek knowledge, and that's why the revolution took place without them knowing it was happening . Ordered to the guillotine was a public health measure, as stipulated Robespierre, to prevent further ill society.
Learning to draw is a long road, painting a canvas is trying to solve a problem, habits, traits with the color or shape, be contemporary artist is not the result of a formation, it is embodied by decree, as the nobility, as dictatorships, because they can. Already discussed the Marquis de Sade, abuse of power is the way to show who is boss and to exercise tyranny over others. Art is what a group decide and is an imposition that must implement the rest that remains outside the circle. This artist, privileged, lazy, arrogant, has the institutional support and to exert market power, without the nasty meddling of the critical attitude of those who observe. For dictators and nobles, the criticism is not his accomplice, is their enemy. Art criticism is subject to the production system as the party in power by accepting and disseminating the official discourse. By the grace of the situation of artists, like the noble absolutists, their illnesses or vices, his penchant for vulgarity, racism and glorification of violence, the denigration of eroticism and sexuality, to the elemental and mindless occurrences, are exemplary and admirable. This artist does not touch the work is not done, take anything and make it a museum piece, commanded to do their work to others he calls "craftsmen." If you engage in the bill dictates that their decisions are correct, that the result is always art and is not subject to a hierarchy of values \u200b\u200bthat challenge the content, the result of the work or the quality. The work validates the artist as such to the extent that disparages the value of the work. The work is denigrated, the lower classes work, the artist who is less than you think. Reduces the work to an activity which does not involve intellectual. The contempt not only covers the real artists, it is an affront to the working society in general. The artist is an absolute unquestionable. That is understandable, questions are collapsing dictatorships and nobles into exile or the guillotine.
the banality of ideas.
The most effective way to distract from the most serious problems is addressed with banality and frivolity. Reduce to a minimum expression. Contemporary art is a preacher of solutions to change the world. Children's solutions, the surface that cause the problem to be almost nonexistent. So the power lives in comfort with these works because they make art an NGO in official discourse. His transgressions are teenage tantrums, the world view is simplistic. If something such as drug paraphernalia has been reduced to customs, if the brutal and cruel social inequality that we are walls covered with bread, if power and imperialism remain Mickey Mouse ears, logos of multinational companies, whether domestic violence and macho are dishes with words and a beer at a table, because that will keep artists because their criticisms are so soft that represent a placebo traitorous accomplice.
Clippings, newspaper headlines, the discourse of art has a lower level of secondary school work. This trivialization of the problems is a symptom of the lack of social involvement that they have. Contemporary art is, above all, elitist. To claim that society has to pay and cheer because someone urinate in public, or accept a block of cement has physical qualities above, is social arrogance and what complaint is their sense of arrogance to artificial status of artists. This intellectual minority that sit on the artists is an advantage for the State, because it gives the excuse of supporting the arts and their "new words", which already have a hundred years, and maintains all numb to the real collective conscience. Injustice and violence in prisons are photos of keychains, and other personal pettiness, is a work willingly pay a bank or a corporation, for its frivolity masks the true intentions of tax evasion and social position they need to have more power . why all these works that are supposed to do that are critical and preachers light of the "social reality" are sponsored by the oligarchs smoothly because the system is never uncomfortable. This art is the drug more sophisticated than ever invented, has numbed society, and makes its addicts delude into believing they are artists. And like the opium war: give them more, make them believe that they are not to think. If anything holds the power is to have citizens who do not question, who live in the comfort of silence and ignorance.
HANDLING OF THOUGHT.
The rhetorical discourse of this great art is: "If you do not like it because you do not understand." Is the despotism of one group over the entire society. The bureaucratic apparatus is required for a minority that rejects the view of society to their poor performance. The museums company paying their taxes, are marginalized from the manifestations of these artists, because he is not qualified to witness them. This art is antisocial. To power the popular voice is a nightmare, because the disadvantaged elementary mathematics, provided the majority, and this is a mirror that never have to look. Those who are outside the benefits of power are almost all, and these should not have a voice or presence. The system of contemporary art is the same, with their low social vocation that exploits resources, it needs complicated infrastructure, create ephemeral works that plunder the institutions and not create acquis, the least you want is people think about their results and what they do. Then disqualified, have neither the training nor the intelligence to present its views. All entries are valid, but no criticism is valid. Praise, as to kings, princes blessings as, money and the banks. That's what they need.
OF THE THRILL OF THE CONSUMER SOCIETY.
"Rich people DECIDED In the Beginning of the year That They Had plenty of money to spend."
Marc Porter President Christie's America .
Consumerism is the freedom of capitalism. Have the purchasing power to consume, buy what you claimed this economic system. Buy orgasm is more correct than you can have: no touching, no risk of catching diseases and it is rewarded, because the buying is worth what you spend. In the pyramid of capitalism, poverty is a crime and wealth is the pinnacle of glory. What a person takes is a letter. Contemporary art has taken consumption limits before anyone had imagined. The flaunting of wealth that gives high prices to pay for garbage is a capitalist demonstrations of more violence and social aggression in the world. In the purchase does not involve taste or the pleasure of watching a play, involving the price, the ratio of folly and cost. The demonstration impose bourgeois bad taste because fashion is deciding who can afford it. Prices are triggered by things in their real value and purpose is only a few dollars, but what has to be quoted in millions is speculation and whimsy. It is an aesthetic revolution. It is a commercial infrastructure in which prices rise to impose a status of non-existent value. This art represents qu and costs, what someone was willing to pay, that's all its worth. The State invests a display of its economic boom, and works never pay collection account, the money is wasted on ephemeral works or invisible. You have to buy more because of the above, nothing remains, creating a chain of consumption that evaporates but that shows that government investment. This is fashion and marketing system works the same as objects of consumption, then the artists have to be new, therein lies the obsession with youth or novelty. All works are essentially the same, so at least the person may be different. We see a parade artists disappear from year to year catalogs, their only mission is to offer something a little more shocking, more vulgar, and so on., because this system makes them disposable. THE art ceases to be to form an evolutionary view of the aesthetic feelings of the individual becomes a consumer must be satisfied as clothing or cars, and the more extravagant and expensive more socially elevates the buyer. If pay for shit, why something will not be able to pay.
Published in Journal Replicante
